Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update linting configuration and enforce name constraint in phases table #574

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 6, 2024

Conversation

thatguyinabeanie
Copy link
Owner

@thatguyinabeanie thatguyinabeanie commented Dec 6, 2024

Adjust the linting settings for better code formatting and implement a migration to enforce a non-null constraint on the name column in the phases table.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated editor settings for improved color decorator functionality.
    • Enforced a NOT NULL constraint on the name field in the phases table to enhance data integrity.
    • Expanded spell checker vocabulary with new terms: logpanel, jacoco, sqltools, and sonarlint.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed duplicate entries in the rubyTestExplorer settings for clarity.
  • Documentation

    • Updated schema version to reflect recent changes.

@thatguyinabeanie thatguyinabeanie enabled auto-merge (squash) December 6, 2024 19:46
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces several updates across different files. The .vscode/settings.json file modifies the editor.defaultColorDecorators setting from a boolean to a string value. A new migration class ChangeNameNullConstraintInPhases is added to enforce a NOT NULL constraint on the name column of the phases table in the database. Lastly, the db/schema.rb file is updated to reflect this change in the column's definition, ensuring data integrity.

Changes

File Change Summary
.vscode/settings.json Updated editor.defaultColorDecorators from true to "auto". Duplicate rubyTestExplorer entries present.
db/migrate/20241206194112_change_name_null_constraint_in_phases.rb Introduced class ChangeNameNullConstraintInPhases to set NOT NULL constraint on name column in phases table.
db/schema.rb Updated version number to 2024_12_06_194112 and modified name column in phases table to null: false.
cspell.config.yaml Added new words: logpanel, jacoco, sqltools, sonarlint to the words section.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Editor
    participant Database

    User->>Editor: Modify settings
    Editor->>Editor: Update `editor.defaultColorDecorators` to "auto"
    Editor->>Database: Enforce NOT NULL on `name` column
    Database-->>Editor: Confirm NOT NULL constraint applied
    Editor-->>User: Settings updated and data integrity enforced
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e291a3f and a39785d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • cspell.config.yaml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
cspell.config.yaml (2)

56-59: Looking good! These dev tools make total sense! 👍

The new words are valid development-related terms that are commonly used in modern development environments.


56-59: Let's double-check if we're using these tools

Hey! Just want to make sure we're actually using these tools in the project. Let me help verify that for you!

✅ Verification successful

Good news! These tools are actually being used in the project 🎉

Looking at the VSCode settings, I can confirm that:

  • logpanel is used with Ruby Test Explorer
  • jacoco is configured in coverage-gutters file patterns
  • sqltools has an active PostgreSQL connection configuration
  • sonarlint is set up in connected mode for the battle-stadium project

These words in the cspell dictionary are valid as they're actively used in the project's tooling configuration.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for the presence and usage of the newly added tools

echo "Checking for configuration files and references..."

# Check for SonarLint config
echo "Checking for SonarLint..."
fd -t f "sonarlint|sonar-project" 

# Check for JaCoCo config
echo "Checking for JaCoCo..."
fd -t f "jacoco"

# Check for SQLTools config
echo "Checking for SQLTools..."
fd -t f ".sqltools"

# Check for references in package files
echo "Checking package files for these tools..."
fd -t f "package.json|Gemfile|Gemfile.lock" -x grep -l "logpanel\|jacoco\|sqltools\|sonarlint" {} \;

# Check VSCode settings
echo "Checking VSCode settings..."
fd -t f "settings.json" .vscode -x grep -l "logpanel\|jacoco\|sqltools\|sonarlint" {} \;

Length of output: 736


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the VSCode settings file to see how these tools are used
echo "Content of .vscode/settings.json:"
cat .vscode/settings.json

# Let's also check for any workflow files that might use these tools
echo -e "\nChecking workflow files for these tools..."
fd -t f "\.ya?ml$" .github/workflows -x grep -l "logpanel\|jacoco\|sqltools\|sonarlint" {} \;

# Let's search for any mentions in documentation
echo -e "\nChecking documentation files..."
rg -l "logpanel|jacoco|sqltools|sonarlint" "*.md"

Length of output: 2627


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Dec 6, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.70%. Comparing base (77ef9e0) to head (a39785d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #574   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.70%   93.70%           
=======================================
  Files          72       72           
  Lines        1731     1731           
  Branches      305      305           
=======================================
  Hits         1622     1622           
  Misses        109      109           
Flag Coverage Δ
rspec 93.70% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 6, 2024

@thatguyinabeanie thatguyinabeanie merged commit 4e647df into main Dec 6, 2024
18 checks passed
@thatguyinabeanie thatguyinabeanie deleted the phase-name-not-nullable branch December 6, 2024 19:55
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant