article addressing performance concerns with the current schema

[catkins-miso]

closes #108

[getorymckeag]

This is good. I left some minor comments, but I also feel like you could lean into our expected interop problems a bit. You don't have to lay it all our here, but we've designed intentional verbosity in this protocol in a couple of areas. You already talked about the issues around periods, but I was thinking about the following:

• Model mismatches, naming convention mismatches (big one)
• Differences in units
• Differences in forecast windows.

[catkins-miso]

• Model mismatches, naming convention mismatches (big one)
  I addressed this here https://github.com/trolie/spec/pull/112/files#diff-f5365834c7ab49f74bc2e501af580fcc2edee6ece91b70f670938973d80f4725R162

• Differences in units
  I believe this was previously addressed in https://github.com/trolie/spec/pull/112/files#diff-f5365834c7ab49f74bc2e501af580fcc2edee6ece91b70f670938973d80f4725R106

• Differences in forecast windows.
  https://github.com/trolie/spec/pull/112/files#diff-f5365834c7ab49f74bc2e501af580fcc2edee6ece91b70f670938973d80f4725R166

[catkins-miso]

I'm going to merge this as I believe I've addressed the requested changes. I'm going to solicit feedback from a few individuals, so I'd like to get this out there and easy legible on trolie.energy