Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

discourse on recourse ratings #132

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 31, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
39 changes: 39 additions & 0 deletions docs/concepts.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -60,6 +60,45 @@ For TROLIE's purposes, a Rating is simply a **proposed** Limit for a Period of
an Operational Window from a Ratings Provider for a particular Power System
Resource.

### Recourse Ratings

For background the reader is directed to sections 180 and 182 of the FERC Order
881 Final Rule as well as [this paragraph](https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2021-27735/p-1394)
from the pro forma Attachment M which states:

> "The Transmission Provider must use Seasonal Line Ratings as a recourse rating in the event that an AAR otherwise required to be used under this Attachment is unavailable."

Additionally, in section 180:

> "Further, while this provision establishes the seasonal line rating as the default recourse rating, the transmission provider retains the ability [...] to use a different recourse rating where the transmission provider reasonably determines such a rating is necessary to ensure the safety and reliability of the transmission system."

Here we are concerned with three circumstances that require might require a recourse rating:

1. A Ratings Provider cannot determine an AAR for a facility with a Ratings Obligation.
2. The Clearinghouse Provider is not in possession of a rating for a Ratings Obligation.
3. The Clearinghouse Provider determines that the rating in its possession is apparently inaccurate.

{: .nb }
> In no situation requiring a recourse rating does the TROLIE specification
> constrain or dictate a course of action. However, in order to have a *working
> definition* of "recourse rating" useful in documenting the specification, we
> examine anticipated uses of recourse ratings in the three circumstances
> identified in the preceding paragraph.

In the first case, under the assumption that the Clearinghouse Provider will
receive the rating, it is anticipated that the Ratings Provider shall send an
appropriate recourse rating, e.g., the effective seasonal rating, when the
Ratings Provider cannot determine an AAR.

The second and third cases might occur when there is a communication outage or
when the rating proposed by the Ratings Provider did not meet pre-coordinated
validation criteria such as timeliness or lying within reasonability bounds.
Regardless, in such circumstances the Clearinghouse Provider is obliged to use a
recourse rating. Typically, the recourse rating in these circumstances is
anticipated to be a rating provided by the Ratings Provider separately, such as
the effective seasonal rating, a verbal override, or even a previously
forecasted rating.

## Power System Resource, or simply _Resource_

A term borrowed from CIM, in the context of TROLIE, a "Resource" is an object of
Expand Down
Loading