Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

try gcc-12 #694

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

try gcc-12 #694

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

victimsnino
Copy link
Owner

@victimsnino victimsnino commented Dec 18, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated compiler version in CI configuration from GCC 10 to GCC 13 for enhanced build performance.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 18, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the CMakePresets.json configuration file, specifically modifying the compiler versions for the ci-gcc preset. The changes involve upgrading the C and C++ compiler environment variables from GCC version 10 to version 13, which will impact the continuous integration build process by using a newer compiler version.

Changes

File Change Summary
CMakePresets.json Updated compiler environment variables in ci-gcc preset from GCC 10 to GCC 13

Poem

🐰 A Compiler's Leap of Joy

From version ten to thirteen we soar,
GCC compilers knocking at the door
Bits and bytes dance with newfound might
Continuous integration shining bright!
Upgrade complete, our code takes flight 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 38488a6 and 46c842d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • CMakePresets.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
CMakePresets.json (2)

90-91: Verify build compatibility with GCC 13

The upgrade from GCC 10 to 13 is a significant version jump that might introduce compatibility issues. Please ensure that:

  1. All C++20 features used in the codebase are supported by GCC 13
  2. The build succeeds with the new compiler version
  3. All tests pass with the new compiler version

This change affects multiple presets that inherit from ci-gcc, including:

  • ci-ubuntu-gcc-tests
  • ci-ubuntu-gcc-benchmarks
  • user-ubuntu-gcc-tests
  • user-ubuntu-gcc-benchmarks
✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more specific information about the C++20 features being used to ensure compatibility with GCC 13.

This will help us understand the specific C++20 features being used and verify their compatibility with GCC 13.


Based on the analysis of the codebase, I can now provide a final response regarding the GCC 13 compatibility:

GCC 13 is compatible with the codebase's C++20 features

The codebase primarily uses well-established C++20 features that are fully supported by GCC 13:

  • Concepts and constraints (concept, requires)
  • Type traits and template metaprogramming
  • Standard library concepts (std::same_as, std::invocable)

No usage of experimental or partially supported C++20 features like coroutines (co_await, co_yield, co_return) or ranges library was found that could cause compatibility issues with GCC 13.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for C++20 feature usage that might be affected
# Search for C++20 features in the codebase
rg -l "concept|requires|consteval|constinit|co_await|co_yield|co_return|ranges::|views::|<span>|<concepts>|<ranges>|<coroutine>"

Length of output: 2183


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for specific C++20 features usage with context
rg -n --heading -C 2 "concept |requires |consteval |constinit |co_await |co_yield |co_return" src/

# Check for ranges and concepts headers usage with context
rg -n --heading -C 2 "#include\s+[<\"].*?(ranges|concepts)[>\"]" src/

Length of output: 50506


90-91: Version mismatch with PR title

The PR title suggests upgrading to GCC 12, but the changes implement GCC 13. Please clarify if this is intentional or if the PR title should be updated to reflect the actual changes.

Comment on lines +90 to +91
"CC" : "gcc-13",
"CXX": "g++-13"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Verify gcov tool compatibility

The compiler is being upgraded to GCC 13, but RPP_GCOV_TOOL still points to gcov-10. This version mismatch might cause issues with code coverage reporting.

Consider updating the gcov tool version to match the compiler version:

   "environment": {
     "CC" : "gcc-13",
     "CXX": "g++-13"
   },
   "cacheVariables": {
-    "RPP_GCOV_TOOL" : "/usr/bin/gcov-10"
+    "RPP_GCOV_TOOL" : "/usr/bin/gcov-13"
   }

Also applies to: 94-96

@victimsnino victimsnino deleted the test_gcc_12 branch December 19, 2024 07:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant