a few small changes to improve readability

[gosko]

Hi, the mockup-rwd design is looking pretty good, nice work!

I find it a little bit difficult to read, maybe because there are so many font styles? I did some experimenting with the style, please let me know what you think.

I made a few small changes to the HTML as well as the CSS:

• replaced "Published on" with a class name
• removed emphasis from "Editor's Draft", and moved that to the same line as "History"
• added an   between words in 'Level 1', to avoid the 1 getting wrapped onto a line of its own (maybe there is a smarter way to do this using CSS instead of  )

[tripu]

@gosko: care to rebase your branch, to better examine the diff (mockup1/index.html has lots of changes)? Or I can do that myself; there are no conflicts, so it's immediate.

[tripu]

Thanks!

[gosko]

@tripu sure, done (I hope!)

[tripu]

@deniak, these changes look good to me.

• The first two require small changes on your side. Are you okay with those?
• The 3^rd is low-priority, I think, and it also has to be implemented server-side. It can wait, as we agreed.

Some of these changes clash with my own in #50; but since this PR was first, I'll take care of merging @gosko's changes with mine.

[deniak]

Thanks @gosko! @tripu feel free to rebase onto master.

[deniak]

Ok, it'll all integrated and will be deployed soon. I think I managed to add the   too when it's necessary.

[gosko]

Hi again @deniak @tripu, I just saw the new version on https://www.w3.org/TR/ and noticed it is missing a few of the changes I suggested; was that deliberate or an oversight?

In particular, I am not a fan of the large font and small line-height used in the spec titles. Also I prefer a less bold font and less padding in the spec maturity labels, but that is fairly minor.

If there is a better way to contribute patches just let me know :)

[deniak]

@gosko yes, we deployed the new version yesterday but there are more "minor" updates coming up. Regarding the changes you suggested, I'm not sure about their status. #50 was conflicting with it so maybe some rules in the CSS were missed during the rebase. @tripu should be able to answer.

About the font size of the title, I agree with you. It looks quite big compared to the rest of the details. @tripu @tanyeah WDYT?

[tripu]

@gosko, @deniak: Yes, #50 changed the markup a bit (and its classes); I had to solve some conflicts when rebasing to be able to merge. Some of @gosko's changes were made obsolete by my own, but I may have broken others inadvertently 😕

So, part deliberate, part oversight…

@gosko, issues and PRs here is the right way! Thank you! Don't give up on us! :)

I'm OK reducing the font size and weight of spec titles, and increasing the line height.

I think I'll submit a new PR with those changes, plus some of what @gosko suggested here: #44 (comment)…