Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update ci.yml #15

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Update ci.yml #15

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

eliotest98
Copy link
Collaborator

@eliotest98 eliotest98 commented Nov 14, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflows for improved compatibility and performance with newer versions of actions, including enhancements to caching and Java setup.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the GitHub Actions workflow configuration for a Java project using Maven. It involves upgrading the versions of several actions: actions/checkout from version 2 to version 4, actions/setup-java from version 1 to version 4, actions/cache from version 2 to version 4, and actions/upload-artifact from version 2 to version 4. The setup-java action now specifies the distribution as 'temurin'. These updates ensure compatibility with JDK 22 and improve the overall workflow structure while maintaining existing triggers.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/ci.yml Updated action versions: checkout from v2 to v4, setup-java from v1 to v4, and cache from v2 to v4.
.github/workflows/cd.yml Updated action versions: checkout from v2 to v4, setup-java from v1 to v4 (with distribution as 'temurin'), cache from v2 to v4, and upload-artifact from v2 to v4.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant GitHub Actions
    participant Maven

    Developer->>GitHub Actions: Push code to dev branch
    GitHub Actions->>GitHub Actions: Checkout code (v4)
    GitHub Actions->>GitHub Actions: Setup Java (v4, 'temurin')
    GitHub Actions->>GitHub Actions: Cache Maven packages (v4)
    GitHub Actions->>Maven: Build project
Loading

Poem

🐇 In the garden of code, we dance and play,
With actions upgraded, we're here to stay.
From v2 to v4, we hop with glee,
Caching our treasures, as swift as can be!
So let’s raise our ears, and give a cheer,
For smoother workflows, the future is near! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)

Line range hint 1-30: Consider future improvements to the CI workflow.

While the current updates are good, consider these future enhancements:

  1. Add a build matrix to test against multiple Java distributions (Temurin, Zulu, etc.)
  2. Include test coverage reporting
  3. Add dependency vulnerability scanning

Would you like me to provide an example configuration with these improvements?

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint

20-20: missing input "distribution" which is required by action "actions/setup-java@v4". all required inputs are "distribution"

(action)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1f1518a and 12ea393.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/ci.yml

20-20: missing input "distribution" which is required by action "actions/setup-java@v4". all required inputs are "distribution"

(action)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (2)

18-18: LGTM! Good practice to use the latest checkout action.

The upgrade to actions/checkout@v4 is a safe improvement that brings the latest features and security updates.


Line range hint 24-28: LGTM! Cache configuration is properly maintained.

The upgrade to actions/cache@v4 is a good improvement, and the cache configuration remains valid with the correct key pattern for Maven packages.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint

20-20: missing input "distribution" which is required by action "actions/setup-java@v4". all required inputs are "distribution"

(action)

Comment on lines +20 to 23
uses: actions/setup-java@v4
with:
java-version: 22
- name: Cache Maven packages
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

⚠️ Potential issue

JDK 22 is incompatible with the project - needs downgrade and distribution parameter

The project is configured to use Java 8 (source and target 1.8) and attempting to use JDK 22 would cause compatibility issues. Additionally, the action requires the distribution parameter.

Apply these changes:

    uses: actions/setup-java@v4
    with:
-     java-version: 22
+     java-version: '8'
+     distribution: 'temurin'
🔗 Analysis chain

Add required 'distribution' parameter for setup-java action.

The actions/setup-java@v4 requires specifying the Java distribution. Additionally, since JDK 22 is very new, we should verify its availability.

Apply this fix:

    uses: actions/setup-java@v4
    with:
      java-version: 22
+     distribution: 'temurin'  # or another supported distribution like 'zulu'

Let's verify JDK 22 support in the chosen action version:


Let me gather more information about the project's Java requirements by checking the pom.xml file and any other build configuration files.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify JDK 22 support in actions/setup-java@v4

# Check the latest release for documentation
gh api repos/actions/setup-java/releases/latest --jq '.body' | grep -i "jdk"

# Look for any issues related to JDK 22 support
gh api search/issues -X GET -f q='repo:actions/setup-java JDK 22 in:title,body' --jq '.items[].title'

Length of output: 888


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find and check Java-related build files
fd -e xml -e gradle -e properties . -x cat {} \; | grep -i "java\|jdk\|source\|target\|release"

# Check if there are any Java source files to understand the codebase
fd -e java . --type f | wc -l

Length of output: 442

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint

20-20: missing input "distribution" which is required by action "actions/setup-java@v4". all required inputs are "distribution"

(action)

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/cd.yml (2)

33-36: Consider adding retention-days for artifacts.

While the upgrade to actions/upload-artifact@v4 is good, consider adding a retention period to manage storage:

    - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
      with:
        name: ArmorStand-Limiter
        path: staging
+       retention-days: 30  # Or adjust based on your needs

Line range hint 6-10: Consider optimizing workflow triggers.

The workflow currently runs on both push to master and PRs to master, which might cause duplicate runs when PRs are merged. Consider:

  1. Using only pull_request for validation
  2. Using only push for deployment
on:
  push:
-   branches: [ master ]
+   branches: [ master ]
+   tags: ['v*']  # Only run on version tags for releases
  pull_request:
    branches: [ master ]
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 12ea393 and c8c0518.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/cd.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/cd.yml (2)

18-18: LGTM! Good upgrade to latest checkout action.

The upgrade to actions/checkout@v4 brings security improvements and better performance.


25-29: LGTM! Cache configuration is well-structured.

The upgrade to actions/cache@v4 is good, and the cache key strategy using pom.xml hash is optimal for Maven dependencies.

Comment on lines +20 to +23
uses: actions/setup-java@v4
with:
java-version: 22
distribution: 'temurin'
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Java 22 upgrade is incompatible with current project configuration

The project is explicitly configured for Java 8:

  • Maven compiler plugin is set to source/target 1.8
  • Dependencies like Spigot API (1.21.1) and Folia API are typically Java 8/11 compatible
  • While some Java files use arrow syntax (->), these are likely lambda expressions supported since Java 8

Recommendations:

  1. Keep Java version at 8 or 11 to match the project's configuration
  2. If Java 22 is desired, first update:
    • Maven compiler plugin configuration
    • Test all dependencies for Java 22 compatibility
    • Verify Spigot/Folia API compatibility with Java 22
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify Java 22 compatibility with the project.

While the upgrade to actions/setup-java@v4 and using Temurin distribution is good, Java 22 is very recent. Please ensure:

  1. All dependencies support Java 22
  2. The project's code is compatible with Java 22

Let me gather more information about the Java version configuration.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check Java version requirements in pom.xml
echo "Checking Java version requirements in pom.xml:"
rg -A 5 "<java.version>|<maven.compiler.source>|<maven.compiler.target>" pom.xml

# Check for potential Java 22 incompatibilities in dependencies
echo "Checking dependencies in pom.xml:"
rg -A 5 "<dependencies>|<dependency>" pom.xml

Length of output: 1696


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for build plugins and their configuration
echo "Checking maven compiler plugin configuration:"
rg -A 10 "maven-compiler-plugin" pom.xml

# Check for any gradle files that might contain Java version
echo "Checking for gradle files:"
fd -e gradle -e gradle.kts -x cat {}

# Check for any Java files using Java 22 features
echo "Checking for Java files using Java 22 features (pattern matching, record patterns, etc.):"
rg -l "sealed|permits|record\s+class|->|yield|switch\s*\(" --type java

Length of output: 1425

@eliotest98 eliotest98 closed this Nov 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant