Configure Ruff to apply flake8-bugbear/isort/pyupgrade

[jhamman]

Fixes #1841
Closes #1862

TODO:

• Add unit tests and/or doctests in docstrings
• Add docstrings and API docs for any new/modified user-facing classes and functions
• New/modified features documented in docs/tutorial.rst
• Changes documented in docs/release.rst
• GitHub Actions have all passed
• Test coverage is 100% (Codecov passes)

[DimitriPapadopoulos]

See existing pull requests #1702, #1703, #1704, I think this partially duplicates those PRs.

[DimitriPapadopoulos]

Why "apply ruff formatting" in this pull request? As far as I can tell, this project is currently using black as a formatter:

zarr-python/.pre-commit-config.yaml

Lines 14 to 17 in cb4230d

	- repo: https://github.com/psf/black
	rev: 24.4.2
	hooks:
	- id: black

[jhamman]

@DimitriPapadopoulos - this PR is pointing at the v3 branch where we aren't using black at the moment. I don't see any problem continuing with #1702, #1703, and #1704 but those are not going to make it into this branch for the 3.0 release. See #1777 for some additional details on our plan for the v3 branch.

[DimitriPapadopoulos]

Understood. So if some additional ruff rules are eventually accepted in the main branch (such as ISC, RSE or RUF), I'll have to manually create a distinct pull request against branch v3 so that they end up in 3.* series, won't I?

[jhamman]

I'll have to manually create a distinct pull request against branch v3 so that they end up in 3.* series, won't I?

That's right.

BTW, I know you've been working on this topic here in Zarr land for a while. Now that I see your PRs against the V3 branch, I'm happy to step aside and let you run that to completion. Would you like me to close this PR?

[DimitriPapadopoulos]

Not at all, please proceed with this PR. I have added a few additional rules that seem of interest to me: #1867, #1868, #1869 against v3. I will rebase them on top of your PR once you're done.

[jhamman]

this exclusion didn't seem to work. I'll rerun.

[jhamman]

This is likely to cause some serious merge conflicts with #1857 - I'm going to hold on this until that has been merged. Hopefully tomorrow 🐎 .

[normanrz]

How much manual work did you have to do for this? If most is automated, I am wondering if just redo the automated steps once #1670 and #1857 are merged? Otherwise, I'm happy to resolve the conflicts.

[normanrz]

Good to know! Fixed in 530e88b

[jhamman]

How much manual work did you have to do for this? If most is automated, I am wondering if just redo the automated steps once #1670 and #1857 are merged? Otherwise, I'm happy to resolve the conflicts.

Little manual work went in here. I'm happy to reapply after your PRs go in.

[normanrz]

Closing in favor of #1890