-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dependency Update to main #710
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yaml
is excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
package.json
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)
87-89
: Clarify the motivation for adding these overrides
Could you please clarify why these specific versions need to be overridden? Typically, overrides are added to:
- Fix security vulnerabilities
- Ensure compatibility between packages
- Prevent breaking changes
Understanding the motivation would help validate if these overrides are necessary.
✅ Verification successful
The overrides appear to be transitive dependencies without direct usage
Based on the analysis of package.json and pnpm-lock.yaml:
- None of these packages (
cross-spawn
,micromatch
,nanoid
) are direct dependencies of the project. - These packages are transitive dependencies used by:
cross-spawn
: Used byeslint
,execa
, andforeground-child
micromatch
: Used byfast-glob
,lint-staged
, andtailwindcss
nanoid
: Used bypostcss
The overrides appear to be setting minimum versions for these transitive dependencies, likely to ensure security patches are included across the dependency tree. This is a common practice to address security vulnerabilities in nested dependencies without waiting for direct dependencies to update their requirements.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct/indirect usage of these packages
echo "Searching for usage of cross-spawn..."
rg -l "cross-spawn"
echo "Searching for usage of nanoid..."
rg -l "nanoid"
# Check package-lock.json or pnpm-lock.yaml for dependency relationships
echo "Checking for dependency relationships..."
fd -e json -e yaml -e yml -x grep -l "cross-spawn\|nanoid" {}
Length of output: 439
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of package.json to understand the dependencies structure
echo "Checking package.json dependencies..."
cat package.json
# Let's also check if there are any audit issues
echo "Checking for audit issues..."
cat pnpm-lock.yaml | grep -A 5 -B 5 "cross-spawn\|nanoid\|micromatch"
Length of output: 6747
"cross-spawn": "^7.0.5", | ||
"micromatch": "^4.0.8", | ||
"nanoid": "^3.3.8" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Security vulnerabilities found in specified dependency versions
The security scan reveals that both dependencies have newer versions with security fixes:
cross-spawn@^7.0.5
:- Current version is vulnerable to ReDoS (HIGH severity)
- Latest patched version is 7.0.6
nanoid@^3.3.8
:- Version 5.0.9 is available with security fixes
- Current version has moderate severity issues with predictable results
Recommendation:
- Update
cross-spawn
to^7.0.6
to patch the HIGH severity ReDoS vulnerability - Consider updating
nanoid
to^5.0.9
which includes security improvements
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify security implications of dependency overrides
The addition of cross-spawn@^7.0.5
and nanoid@^3.3.8
to pnpm overrides needs verification:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for security advisories and latest versions
echo "Checking security advisories and latest versions..."
# Check for vulnerabilities in cross-spawn
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "cross-spawn") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
# Check for vulnerabilities in nanoid
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "nanoid") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
# Check latest versions from npm registry
echo "Latest versions:"
for pkg in cross-spawn nanoid; do
echo "$pkg: $(npm view $pkg version)"
done
Length of output: 2228
Summary by CodeRabbit
cross-spawn
andnanoid
.