Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

objects: add account/note details to ProvenTransaction #403 #481

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 28, 2024

Conversation

hackaugusto
Copy link
Contributor

@hackaugusto hackaugusto commented Feb 26, 2024

add account/note details to ProvenTransaction #403

@hackaugusto
Copy link
Contributor Author

hummmm, the CI is failing with error: cannot find macro format in this scope. Weirdly enough locally I don't get this error (although I get different ones). I have to look into what is causing the differences.

Copy link
Contributor

@bobbinth bobbinth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Thank you! I left a few small comments inline.

the CI is failing with error: cannot find macro format in this scope

I think we may just need to import format macro the way we usually import vec macro in other places.

One other thought for the future: I think with this addition the client may be able to get rid of TransactionResult struct as we could use output_note_details to store note details for off-chain notes as well. Though, we'll need to be careful not to leak off-chain info when not needed (e.g., when sending a transaction to the node).

cc @igamigo.

Copy link
Contributor

@bobbinth bobbinth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Thank you! I left a couple of minor comments inline. After these, we can merge.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants