-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[RVBC] Add new object type RVBC #677
Conversation
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for your AFF! Here are my suggestions
Hi @GuilhermeSaraiva96, Thank you for taking time reviewing our AFF. I have changed the AFF according to the suggestions from the review. Could you please kindly help to have a check again? Best regards, Ray |
Hi @GuilhermeSaraiva96 , I have changed the AFF and the description header in the JSON file according to our call yesterday. In addition I added the ID field which is the review booklet ID, which for the similar reason of ina1_service_id it needs to be carried all the way to be able to run RAP based EML statement to identify the correct review booklet and do the corresponding changes. |
7407826
to
fbd17c7
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, @RuixingYangSAP . I think you made great improvements.
I have added some further comments/questions.
Hello @schneidermic0 and @GuilhermeSaraiva96 , Happy new year! thanks for the review, and I have responsed in all the conversations. Could you please kindly have another review? thanks & BR, Ray |
Hi @schneidermic0 , changes are done as we just discussed. Could you please kindly help review again? Thx & BR, Ray |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for updating the file format, @RuixingYangSAP.
Looks good for me, now.
Hi @GuilhermeSaraiva96, the merge is currently pending on your review. could you please kindly have a look? Thx & BR, Ray |
@GuilhermeSaraiva96 won't be available this week. However, usually, we merge changes as soon input of the UX review is incorporated as well. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AFF looks good to me as well!
Hi @schneidermic0, I have merged the 2 ina service sections into 1 according to the request from UX review( issues 92 ). additionally there is a renaming of title for the field 'application' to be consistent to our fiori app. could you pleaes kindly review and approve? BR, Ray |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for adapting the changes regarding to our UX review! I just have one proposal for the naming.
Hi @schneidermic0 , I made a new commit & push on updating AFF and relevant objects, but the build failed with follow error: Error: This request has been automatically failed because it uses a deprecated version of |
33992af
to
bdc17e5
Compare
Argh, I have used rebase. My fault... #683 solved the build issues. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me, now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, looks good to me as well
No description provided.