Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RVBC] Add new object type RVBC #677

Merged
merged 30 commits into from
Feb 5, 2025
Merged

Conversation

RuixingYangSAP
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

cla-assistant bot commented Dec 5, 2024

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

Copy link

cla-assistant bot commented Dec 5, 2024

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@huber-nicolas huber-nicolas added the new-object This is a new object type added to AFF label Dec 6, 2024
Copy link

@GuilhermeSaraiva96 GuilhermeSaraiva96 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your AFF! Here are my suggestions

file-formats/rvbc/type/zif_aff_rvbc_v1.intf.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
file-formats/rvbc/type/zif_aff_rvbc_v1.intf.abap Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
file-formats/rvbc/type/zif_aff_rvbc_v1.intf.abap Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
file-formats/rvbc/type/zif_aff_rvbc_v1.intf.abap Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
file-formats/rvbc/type/zif_aff_rvbc_v1.intf.abap Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
file-formats/rvbc/type/zif_aff_rvbc_v1.intf.abap Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
file-formats/rvbc/type/zif_aff_rvbc_v1.intf.abap Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
file-formats/rvbc/type/zif_aff_rvbc_v1.intf.abap Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
file-formats/rvbc/type/zif_aff_rvbc_v1.intf.abap Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
file-formats/rvbc/type/zif_aff_rvbc_v1.intf.abap Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@RuixingYangSAP
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @GuilhermeSaraiva96, Thank you for taking time reviewing our AFF. I have changed the AFF according to the suggestions from the review. Could you please kindly help to have a check again? Best regards, Ray

file-formats/rvbc/type/zif_aff_rvbc_v1.intf.abap Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
file-formats/rvbc/type/zif_aff_rvbc_v1.intf.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
file-formats/rvbc/type/zif_aff_rvbc_v1.intf.abap Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@RuixingYangSAP
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @GuilhermeSaraiva96 , I have changed the AFF and the description header in the JSON file according to our call yesterday. In addition I added the ID field which is the review booklet ID, which for the similar reason of ina1_service_id it needs to be carried all the way to be able to run RAP based EML statement to identify the correct review booklet and do the corresponding changes.
please kindly help to have another review to see if everything is ok.

file-formats/rvbc/type/zif_aff_rvbc_v1.intf.abap Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
file-formats/rvbc/type/zif_aff_rvbc_v1.intf.abap Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
file-formats/rvbc/type/zif_aff_rvbc_v1.intf.abap Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
file-formats/rvbc/README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@schneidermic0 schneidermic0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @RuixingYangSAP . I think you made great improvements.

I have added some further comments/questions.

file-formats/rvbc/examples/z_aff_example_rvbc.rvbc.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
file-formats/rvbc/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
file-formats/rvbc/type/zif_aff_rvbc_v1.intf.abap Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@RuixingYangSAP
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello @schneidermic0 and @GuilhermeSaraiva96 , Happy new year! thanks for the review, and I have responsed in all the conversations. Could you please kindly have another review? thanks & BR, Ray

@RuixingYangSAP
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @schneidermic0 , changes are done as we just discussed. Could you please kindly help review again? Thx & BR, Ray

Copy link
Contributor

@schneidermic0 schneidermic0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for updating the file format, @RuixingYangSAP.

Looks good for me, now.

@schneidermic0 schneidermic0 added the ux-review ready AFF is ready for UX review label Jan 21, 2025
@RuixingYangSAP
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @GuilhermeSaraiva96, the merge is currently pending on your review. could you please kindly have a look? Thx & BR, Ray

@schneidermic0
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @GuilhermeSaraiva96, the merge is currently pending on your review. could you please kindly have a look? Thx & BR, Ray

@GuilhermeSaraiva96 won't be available this week.

However, usually, we merge changes as soon input of the UX review is incorporated as well.

Copy link

@GuilhermeSaraiva96 GuilhermeSaraiva96 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AFF looks good to me as well!

@RuixingYangSAP
Copy link
Contributor Author

RuixingYangSAP commented Jan 29, 2025

Hi @schneidermic0, I have merged the 2 ina service sections into 1 according to the request from UX review( issues 92 ). additionally there is a renaming of title for the field 'application' to be consistent to our fiori app. could you pleaes kindly review and approve? BR, Ray

Copy link
Contributor

@wurzka wurzka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for adapting the changes regarding to our UX review! I just have one proposal for the naming.

file-formats/rvbc/type/zif_aff_rvbc_v1.intf.abap Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@RuixingYangSAP
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @schneidermic0 , I made a new commit & push on updating AFF and relevant objects, but the build failed with follow error: Error: This request has been automatically failed because it uses a deprecated version of actions/upload-artifact: v3. Learn more: https://github.blog/changelog/2024-04-16-deprecation-notice-v3-of-the-artifact-actions/
details can be found in the above failed check.
can you please have a look, and guide is there anything can be done from our side?
thx & BR, Ray

@schneidermic0
Copy link
Contributor

Argh, I have used rebase. My fault...

#683 solved the build issues.

Copy link
Contributor

@schneidermic0 schneidermic0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, now.

Copy link
Contributor

@wurzka wurzka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, looks good to me as well

@wurzka wurzka merged commit 2bdb14e into SAP:main Feb 5, 2025
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
new-object This is a new object type added to AFF ux-review ready AFF is ready for UX review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants