Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

admin-guide: clarify queue property name requirements #259

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2024

Conversation

grondo
Copy link
Contributor

@grondo grondo commented Jan 19, 2024

Problem: There is a statement in the admin guide that it is good practice to use property names that match the corresponding queue name, but no reason for this practice is given.

Explain that queue properties do not need to match the queue name, but note that it is good practice because it allows flux-resource list to suppress these duplicate names in is output.

Problem: There is a statement in the admin guide that it is good
practice to use property names that match the corresponding queue
name, but no reason for this practice is given.

Explain that queue properties do not need to match the queue name,
but note that it is good practice because it allows flux-resource
list to suppress these duplicate names in is output.
Copy link
Member

@garlick garlick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for that!

@grondo grondo added the merge-when-passing mark PR for auto-merging by mergify.io bot label Jan 24, 2024
@grondo
Copy link
Contributor Author

grondo commented Jan 24, 2024

Thanks!

@mergify mergify bot merged commit c4978ce into flux-framework:master Jan 24, 2024
7 checks passed
@grondo grondo deleted the queues-clarify branch January 24, 2024 15:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merge-when-passing mark PR for auto-merging by mergify.io bot
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants