Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add sd-jwt vc profile to vci #128
add sd-jwt vc profile to vci #128
Changes from 16 commits
907df86
5445eed
2f7293d
7edba46
ab1e2d2
a08908e
a4f63a7
c33b9c5
cdd3ffe
d6abcb6
79e7c2f
ff79ac5
b678b63
c62c29b
6d61d61
9d7fdd8
b0b5d5f
79dfddc
a2dd7d0
f8b0d45
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will conflict with with the
credential_configurations_supported
change.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
how?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need to clearer about when VCT and credential_identifier are both present in a credential request? Does one need to take precedent, what if they conflict?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we do, I think it should be clarified when addressing issue #132.
the clarification should also be in this section that defines the behavior of credential request https://openid.github.io/OpenID4VCI/openid-4-verifiable-credential-issuance-wg-draft.html#name-credential-request, so this is probably out of scope of this PR.
the current thinking has been that both format specific claims and credential_identifier can be present since it is possible to use both scopes and RAR in the same authz request
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I cannot think of any case where both, the credential_identifier and the
vct
could be in the same request, so this should be a MUST NOT ifcredential_identifier
is present.The credential request text already states "When this parameter is used, the
format
parameter and any other Credential format specific set of parameters such as those defined in (#format_profiles) MUST NOT be present."Additionally, I'm not sure these requirements should be stated in a profile as the interplay between credential_identifier and format+format specific type information is subject to the core spec. I think the profile should state something like: "
vct
: determines the type of a credential of this format, might also be used in credential request ..."There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right. I confused the ability to use both for the same credential - we still currently support using RAR for one credential and format/type for another with the same access token.
This came up because 'vct' is mandatory when format/type is used but must not be present when credential_identifier is used. So honestly, I would suggest that current language works ok.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I clarified for all other credential formats, too.